Comprehensive coverage

The particle accelerator in Geneva will only be back in operation in October

The CERN management reports this week that the renovation process of the particle accelerator, which was damaged by a short circuit shortly after its start-up in September 2008, will begin with test runs in September 2009 and full operation a month later

The repairs at the particle accelerator in Geneva. Photo: CERN
The repairs at the particle accelerator in Geneva. Photo: CERN

It seems that the delay in operating the LHC - the large particle accelerator at the Sarn facility on the Switzerland-France border, will be longer than planned. The repair to the malfunction that occurred in September 2008 is ongoing, but Saran reports on some progress. Repair costs are expected to reach the $16 million mark as engineers rebuild the damaged electromagnets and monitor every point where an electrical failure may be hiding that, if not repaired, will disrupt future activity in the complex accelerator.

According to the European Organization for Nuclear Research (the English acronym of CERN), the Large Hadron Collider will resume operations in September 2009, and that the first collision between particles will occur only a month later.

If you eagerly awaited the accelerator's big start-up on September 10, 2008, only to be disappointed by the transformer failure the next day, but took solace in the fact that the LHC was still on track for action, only to be depressed by the failure of the high-tech magnets on September 20, you should now lower your expectations . LHC repairs are continuing as planned, some potential faults have been identified and fixed, and spare parts are being installed in place, but there is good news. Universe Today's Ian O'Neill heard from one of his contacts that LHC scientists are optimistic about starting collisions in October 2009.

CERN director Rolf Hutter issued a statement this week in which he said: "The schedule we have right now is without a doubt the best for the LHC and for the physicists who are waiting for the data," he said. "There is a reasonable certainty that all the work that is being done now will achieve its goal, and the physicists will be able to start obtaining clues this year.

This is therefore a year behind schedule, but at least the time when we will capture the Higgs boson is approaching.


For the news in Universe Today

75 תגובות

  1. Can not wait. If this time there is a failure, I guess they will stop funding them

  2. I read in a question and answer article where it said that there are scientists who believe that the accelerator is dangerous and I'm a little confused about what might happen from the accelerator
    the article:http://www.lhcfacts.org/

  3. Kirin,

    If I understood correctly, the blog refers to a hypothetical simulation, which relies on an unproven theory, which swims in a sea of ​​other unproven theories. The simulation predicts that the accelerator could produce black holes that survive for a second or more.

    I would not attach official importance to the subject, since the whole idea is based on chicken's knees: one must be careful not to rely on simulations that have not been tested in reality and on theories that are not proven. According to all the knowledge we have today, the accelerator is not supposed to create long-lived black holes, otherwise such black holes would be created continuously on the surface of the earth, as a result of the impact of high-energy cosmic rays in the atmosphere.

    ------

    Come visit the new science blog - Another science

  4. I didn't really understand scientifically what the blog meant because I deduced something and maybe that's the reason for my concern happy holiday...

  5. A particularly interesting response from the same blog:

    Don't create black holes. The current theory of what powers them is incorrect.

    The true source of a black holes gravitational energy isn't the mass that gets sucked into it. That mass gets destroyed in the singularity. So does the energy it is composed of. It gets destroyed when the gravitational force that sucks it in makes it exceed the speed of light because exceeding the speed of light in space destroys the representation of the Dirac Sea; ie, it destroys light, energy, matter, and spacetime. The singularity inside a black hole is the only thing that violates the conservation of energy. There is a universal law more powerful than the conservation of energy. That is the conservation of nonexistence. Nonexistence cannot be destroyed because it is nonexistent. It is the lack of existence. The conservation of nonexistence is the first cause of symmetry. It is the cause of dark energy and the cause of the Dirac Sea.

    Inside the event horizon of a black hole lies nonexistence. No Dirac Sea. No energy. No space. No time. No dimensions. Black holes are powered by the dark energy difference between the nonexistence inside the black hole and normal space outside it. If you don't know this, there is a finite chance you could destroy the earth. The energy of the Dirac Sea outside the black hole is inexhaustible. It is the most powerful energy source in the universe. We don't know how to contain it.

    As far as cosmic rays, the creation of a black hole involves more than energy. The thing that actually triggers the creation of a black hole is energy being forced to exceed the speed of light in free space. Cosmic rays don't do that, unless they get sucked into a black hole.

    This is based on research still to be published. Ignore at your peril.

    ------

    Come visit the new science blog - Another science

  6. Kirin:
    We do the experiment because we don't know what will happen in a collision.
    If they knew - there would be no need for an experiment.
    What we do know is that nothing will happen in the experiment that doesn't already happen elsewhere in the universe without causing any damage, so there is no reason for fear.
    We do the experiment because in those places where such collisions occur, we do not have measuring devices that can clarify for us what the results of the collision are.
    There are several theories as to the possible outcomes of the experiment and it is possible that the experiment will be able to determine if some of these theories (or maybe even all) are wrong.
    The site has many articles on the subject and in them there is a popular explanation of the various theories and what they hope to discover in the experiment.
    You can find more details here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LHC

  7. Someone explain to me... what will actually happen during the collisions and what are they actually looking for there and most importantly: is it dangerous for our lives?

  8. And Yehuda and Michael:
    You warmed the core of the core of the core of the sub-sub-sub-particles:) Thank you from among our nano-nano-nano-particles:)

  9. Yehuda:
    My father was for a time in the state mission in Liberia.
    In this context, he was once hosted by the Nimba tribe and they gave him the title of "tribal head".
    Just as there is an "honorary doctor" there is, it turns out, also an "honorary tribal chief"

  10. I waste time and patiently read the comments,

    and thinking,
    To what low level have we reached on the site for science...

    Hezi

  11. To Michael
    Really, really, I didn't want to offend, and just joking a bit, I don't understand what offended you or hurt you there.
    But Hugin also said it was mean so apparently I'm missing something.
    So first of all and I really apologize (sincerely!) Secondly, accept this in a good spirit because I had no intention of offending.
    Third thing, you can't deny that you are something special because I don't know many who are members of a clan head, so tell us about it when you have the opportunity.
    So good night Michael
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  12. Yehuda:
    I did notice that you solved the riddle, but I was offended by what you said, so I reacted the way I did.
    I think anyone in my place would be offended and unfortunately this is part of a whole treatise.
    I would be happy if you decide to see this point as a turning point and return to attitudes that are purely factual.

    Hugin:
    And did I say that a bizarre response is incorrect?
    I only said that I don't understand her and you never bother to explain, so it's a waste of effort.
    You don't have to offer me to understand at my own pace.
    I have no other option.
    I do appreciate that this rate is very high, but you have the right to think otherwise.
    I also tend to believe that when you say something that I don't understand (and usually I really don't have problems understanding what is being read and I'm actually known as someone who would rather take a look at a contract before signing it) - the problem is in the way you say it and maybe even in your understanding of what you're saying, but since it's just a belief And I have no desire to start trying to decipher a text that the author was lazy in writing - I just don't care.

  13. 22:27 Cooking!! Hahaha
    By the way: tomorrow Yehuda and his 'African' wife:) are celebrating their wedding day - congratulations!! And you know what? My dear Ishii and I are also celebrating our wedding day tomorrow according to the Hebrew date. - congratulations - and that's a fact!!
    Nice no ??
    Speaking of unexpected connections,

  14. Michael:
    A 'bizarre' response is not defined as incorrect!
    But since everything also needs to be examined and investigated from every possible direction, this statement is said in order to put things in the right proportion as long as 'things' have not reached their peripheral rational maturity.
    Therefore, it is 'your place' to continue to be honest with yourself - as much as you can and to understand at your own pace.
    You may be an expert in things that my local is less concerned with, but that doesn't mean that I don't read, refer to and internalize what is right for my purpose, and it's fascinating to see all the other responses according to the articles being streamed.
    Hope we understood something seriously.

  15. Hello dear Mr. Michael!

    You asked a riddle and since I know that you were born in Israel, I realized that the remaining two facts are true. And it took me exactly ten seconds. Now should I answer your riddle and ruin the fun for others?, or maybe give a deep hint that I know the solution?
    Everyone understands that at least one of the African conditions is correct because there are years but when I wrote down "African opening conditions", in the plural, it shows that I knew the solution to the puzzle.
    Of course, I was standing before dinner and I remembered the hungry Africans who dip their food here and there in animal proteins and thereby help eliminate competing genes for their genes. So Mr. Michael, please see this only as a special and juicy solution to your puzzle.

    And to glorify the name of Hugin the Pole, who guarded my honor while my notes were saved, here is an upgraded joke for you about a Polish mother in Africa, and an act that was like this:-
    A tribe of cannibals caught Hugin and decided to celebrate and put her in a pot, but see it's a miracle, through the steam of the soup Hugin suddenly sees the son of the head of the tribe - our dear friend Michael.
    "Oh dear Michael, how are you, I'm finally saved!"
    Michael looks at her and they hug and kiss and Michael turns to his fellow cooks:-
    "Friend, this is Poland, it needs to be cooked well!"
    The truth is that now when I see this joke I realize that I feel a little sorry for Michael because everyone knows he is a vegetarian. But out of respect for the Polish mother I will leave the joke.
    Good day Michael!
    And not to censor jokes!
    And smile!
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  16. Hugin:
    I'm sorry but I don't know how to take bizarre comments seriously.
    When you say something I agree with - I take it seriously.
    When you say something I don't agree with - I take it seriously.
    When you say something I don't understand - since in the past, when I demanded clarifications, I never received them and only got bizarre arguments in their place - I don't take it seriously.

  17. Michael:
    Between me and Higgs this time there was no defamation!! Not for me anyway!! And my comments are facts! Read, check and understand and then decide whether to get angry, if at all.
    But since your intention was good, I even shared with you seriously, which corresponds to my intellectual honesty. Maybe I shouldn't have commented??
    I still expect you to take my comments seriously even if they are 'bizarre', in your eyes
    But there is no obligation for you to respond, if they are not in your 'spirit'.
    However, I have patience.

  18. Hugin:
    First of all, the question started like this: "Let's see if you can guess what the wrong claim is about my personal history:"
    Therefore it is indeed a matter of guesses and only guesses (and if there is relevant knowledge then the guess is informed).
    This is also the case in the game I told you about - Spot the not.

    Notice how it happens that when I am simply trying to separate you from Higgs when you are dragged into pointless mutual slanders (and do everything so that it is in a good and humorous spirit) you simply drag me pointlessly into an argument of the same kind.
    enough!

  19. Michael:
    The facts you wrote are the assumptions on which they are based: section 2 you wrote: "I was born in France"! I do not refer to the rest of the speculations as a questionable figure.
    And as I said..it is not about matters of guesswork,, riddles of this kind are not relevant.

  20. Hugin:
    First of all, in relation to my question - it was a question about facts and I don't know what kind of consideration can even be applied here.
    It's just that my mother was really born in Somalia and my father was really the head of an African tribe (the Nimba tribe) but I was born in Israel and not in France.
    In relation to your memory? what is he saying? When there is a comment that does not contain a single truth claim and its entire purpose is to serve as a platform to defame me (and there were many such comments) I call it malice.
    If you prefer to call it kindness - let it be your perfume.

  21. Michael:
    Yehuda is not malicious in the rest of his responses, and this time too, it is possible, ironically, that your mystery evoked slightly malicious associations, nothing more,
    Well, maybe also the 'dark mass' that overshadows you too, Michael, from seeing 'pointed' under the sub-particle surface,
    It's time for you to 'think' and not engage in 'guessing' that is not clear where you are making them up.

  22. Michael: Regarding your riddle, it was not a guess at all, even if the consideration is not correct to your liking, but you must explain why, how and how if I have not yet understood.
    Regarding the other matter: I have the patience and memory of an elephant, "embedded in the genes".

  23. Hugin:
    Don't call not joining your dreams "not waking up" because joining dreams actually involves falling asleep.
    We guessed, by the way, wrong.
    A and C are true and the only thing that is not true is that I was born in France.

  24. Well, Michael, you're probably referring to section 3, only that I don't know what "head of an African tribe" requires in terms of origin, mobility, location, and verbs that aren't talked about.
    At most we will wildly assume: that your Somali mother:) was violated by the 'head':) rolled over to France and you left,,,
    *
    And yet: it's a shame that you don't take the rest of my comments seriously, and it's more 'sad' that in your famous topic: What is a soul? That in my last response there, as you said - I did wake up, but you didn't wake up at all, not to mention that your parts are in a 'non-sensory' state , are procrastinating or maybe they will wait until the month of October,,, for the accelerator and all that implies,, if at all.

    *
    And Shlomo: You are invited to earn the respect of the 'considered and educated' to respond to the article about the accelerator for generations.

  25. Yehuda:
    Well done for another defamatory, wrong, irrelevant and mean comment.

  26. To Michael
    I now understand how with opening conditions such cannibalistic Africans allowed you to be the main censor of the knowledge site.
    On the occasion of the 200th anniversary of Darwin's evolution, a special study should be done on the African mutations Shashyam - Michael!

    Good Day
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  27. Society:
    Maybe just stop fighting?
    You talked about an origin, so let's try to guess something.
    There is a game on TV called Spot the Not in which all kinds of claims are made, only one of which is wrong.
    Let's see if you can guess what the wrong claim is about my personal history:
    1. My mother was born in Somalia
    2. I was born in France
    3. Father of an African tribe

  28. Higgs:
    Apparently, a very strange motivational and mutational evolution is working on the Jewish people :)

  29. No Higgs, I'm not from Warsaw,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, my family perished hahahahahaha there mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm with ???,,,,,,,,,,,,)and so it remains,,Nazar..good.
    There is no need for you to try to poison.
    But, if you have good jokes: Tell me, I allow you to laugh at me in a good spirit if you feel like it.

  30. Hugin
    Are you waaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr in u???!!!! really??????
    I know some jokes about Polishness from waaaaarrrshhhh.

  31. Hugin
    Your obsession with arguments is back, you've already forgotten that you're googling in tar and feathers and are rolling with your tail sweeping all the stairs. No problem.
    On the comparison of the holocaust with the burning of mice you made the expression retarded was a gentle expression.
    I am a second child to Holocaust survivors when my parents spent time in Hitler's holiday camps. When my father went through dozens and more selections of Mangala to the gas chambers. In the winter, for hours when everyone stands naked in minus twenty cold. On the train trips that sometimes lasted about two weeks without water and without food in freight cars open to the snow. On trips in the German forests when the lagging water was shot and thrown on the side of the road. more and more. Please try another one of your jokes and let's see the height of your low forehead. I don't have extra time for you, but I promise to surpass last time.

  32. Hugin:
    There is no way Shlomo is a Higgs.
    Shlomo is a dark man and Higgs actually tends to confront such people.

  33. After the harsh words of Mr. "Shlomo" last night to Michael and Lee-Hugin, I would ask and perhaps suggest to all the sharp-eyed and discerning on the site to pay attention to the subtleties that extend to 'some connection' and if your diagnosis is successful, then also to the connections between the Higgs-Boson (the hypothetical quantum particle) that is tracking By 'Mr'-Higgs/boson 'Dear' the site and between? 'Adon Shlomo' - the man of Torah culture who gives his sermons on this site and who claims similar to 'Adon Higgs' to the pub saturated with 'consideration and education'.:
    Aren't they both: one??
    Despite the 'slight lag' in the gap between my deep thoughts/and maybe also the sublime,,? And between the 'ability' or perhaps a certain disability to convey them clearly, I would be happy if the 'brilliant' among you were able to absorb the central person I am striving for in my disturbed 'mistakes',,,!???
    And 'what is a soul'? Why?: think of states of coma/a coma = unconsciousness. (Really?)
    Also think about the words of our Yehuda Sabdarmish in the first response and his insinuation about the dark mass.. What is it?
    Think about the fact that in a certain way the atoms/yes the particles found in everything that exists, everywhere at any moment are not 'recognized' as having 'any mental consciousness', are they really?
    And what about all the atoms that make up the particles that we live in? Do they not have 'consciousness' or 'a conscious mind'??
    So the sages of the site will forgive me for the loftiness of Timtomi and Gigi and the contexts of 'here and now' and the subtleties of 'spying' (Higgs-Shlomo?) that I had to share with you and encourage you to think together.
    It's just like this:: When you hurt my 'heart-soul' by a nickname that is not respectful,, I also think of all the children who ask smart and sober questions at every moment at every hour and in the education system,, and are 'nicknames' such as the one expressed by 'Higgs' and expressed A 'whole' soul is not a product of a 'Torah' system and the entire defective establishment, not to mention 'domestic oppression' rooted in the 'soul'—or perhaps the 'comatose of oblivion'.
    Sorry,, that we had to 'descend to the bottom' as a result of the 'Betzeran Accelerator',,, in order to track down something that activates all of us 'the whole kishka',, (and also the Jewish soul within us!) I'm sorry for that. ??
    But,, until October?? We have time,, and I am indeed curious - to the point of horror, for the continuation of the coverage regarding that subatomic 'experiment' and its consequences.

  34. Apparently 'this' stupidity is contagious.
    So, Solomon? If you have something sound and educated to teach us about the accelerator, we would be happy to hear/read your thoughts on the matter.
    Earn your honor/but not at the expense of our poor honor, which is also humiliated by you,

  35. Apparently 'this' stupidity is contagious. So, Solomon? If you have something sound and educated to teach us about the accelerator, we would be happy to hear/read your thoughts on the matter.
    Earn your honor/but not at the expense of our poor honor, which is also humiliated by you,

  36. Shlomo:
    Unfortunately I feel the need to answer stupid comments as well.
    This includes some of my responses to Hugin's words and all of my responses to your words.

    All the best (and I hope there is a slap here).

  37. Hugin and Michael -
    Please go and travel somewhere else! You are pathetic and unfunny, and really not entertaining.
    All the jangling of your words causes the atoms that were inserted into my stomach some time ago (at noon)
    rise in disgust upwards.
    Please - vacate the area in favor of thoughtful and educated among you.
    With respect, appreciation and thanks in advance and from the bottom of my heart (and there is no contradiction here!!)

  38. Michael? Or does he not exist?
    Thanks for the clarifications between us.
    I am always allowed to express my joy.
    Besides, when dealing with sub-particles naturally descend to their 'lowness', the question is whether in this we do not in fact and in fact 'rise to their sublimity' because reason may and may be found in our sub-sub-elements and has never disappeared, even if we were opaque/clogged to see it.

  39. Hugin:
    I am not condescending.
    She is the one who descends to the bottom of the step and from her position, every place looks arrogant.
    particle accelerator particle accelerator
    I explained that their acceleration gives them energy (it's called kinetic energy if you remember ever learning). During the collision, this energy is partially converted - along with the mass of the colliding particles - into the mass of particles that are created in the collision and of course also into the kinetic energy of those particles.
    Yes!! I don't know why this is so surprising to you. Since it surprises you - it's a sign that until now you didn't know about it and didn't recognize it. Your hypocrisy is expressed in the expression of joy that ("finally") I recognize this - as if you have been trying for years to make me understand this even though you yourself did not know it until you heard about it from me.
    I'm really different from you and the difference is that I really don't see things that don't exist.

  40. Michael: You are condescending, but I would love to continue experimenting in order to understand.
    Besides, what you say that in fact the 'particle accelerator' as its name is a 'particle' accelerator, (is in fact an array sequence of particles) and in the experiment planned in the different accelerations that are planned in the Besar accelerator (which is one of the many types of accelerators in the world, although it is the Besar, the largest of them all ,,) they may go through some kind of discoveries and certain 'mutations' and create 'new particles' from them,,
    ??
    And I'm still happy despite my 'hypocrisy' that you are present in that the particles inside me vibrate and play and 'poet' to you in my response to the 'substantiality' of their wonderful atomic nature, and despite this, always surpasses my understanding in its revelations/and are you really different or just don't see??

  41. Hugin
    You are happy to prove that I recognize something that I have always recognized and that your responses showed that you do not understand it.
    So I am happy for your joy and saddened by your hypocrisy.
    The rest of your poem - sorry to say - I did not understand.
    It's no wonder when you write "substantial" instead of "substantial"

  42. hahaha :)
    I am happy to prove that you recognize that particles are created from energy,,(??)
    But it is still speculated according to the conditions of different speeds and hypothetical calculations, which you may be more knowledgeable about Rem than I am, that under certain conditions an approximate X particle will be discovered, and under probability conditions B an approximate T particle will be found, and so on.
    If you insist that this experiment is indeed intended to 'restore creation' there is 'from nothing' or more correctly from,, energy at different accelerations/periods of time, the question will still be asked what is that energy and whether it is essential or the changes in its states and/or also significant circumstantial conditions and others that may or may not have been taken into account and that they are in fact the 'substrate' that affects the entire experiment and cannot be excluded from all the aspects that influence / 'create'/or 'reveal' the effect of the entire experiment.

  43. Hugin:
    Here's another thing you should not learn.
    Particles are created from energy.
    We are not going to look for existing particles in the accelerator space. For that you don't need an accelerator or maybe it's more correct to say that an accelerator doesn't help with that either.
    All accelerators create particles from energy.
    The same goes for Sarn.
    Accelerate the particles to a very high speed and thus give them enormous energy which during the collision turns into particles of different types and we hope that particles that we do not know will also be created there.
    But I remind you not to learn anything from this.

  44. According to calculations that I have come back and made, the full activation of the accelerator will create a black hole and destroy the Earth as we know it in 32 minutes. The entire solar system will collapse into it in about a month.
    We just have to be happy that there was a postponement at this time and take advantage of our last moments, including having unprotected sex with a huge number of partners, consuming prohibited substances and using all our savings to buy electronics.

  45. Michael:

    I really hope that others don't learn anything from you, unless they are smart enough to find out if there is anything substantial left after your words.
    In any case, the experiment has been postponed until September, so we have time until then,,,,
    Yet:
    What do you mean by "creating" particles?? Aren't they hypothetical and we are supposed to find or discover them??

  46. Hugin:
    No. I don't see that you learned anything from me.
    You are still welcome to answer matter-of-factly.

  47. Hugin:
    In short - apart from bragging and defaming you said nothing.
    Like I didn't watch it.
    Now you understand why I didn't bother to answer you section by section in the first place?

  48. Michael:
    to distinguish a thousand differences and billions of consciousnesses from you, I ask!!! I ask!! I research, check, wonder, learn, learn, learn and you????? In short, a fascinating phenomenon that is worth continuing to explore and wonder about...
    And thank you to the speedster in Saran who helps us in the discovery processes, the Lord of the Faces.
    What will you learn from this???
    Regards from Mahognoda :)

  49. Yehuda:
    Did you mean Schrödinger or are you talking about another cat?
    In any case - I don't need a cat's consent.

    Hugin:
    In your own way, you attribute to yourself abilities, knowledge and talents that you do not have.
    Exalting those "talents"/failures, you look at us - humans - with contempt and disdain.

    "So what do we learn from the behavior of the particles in the axis?"
    Although the accelerator has not yet been activated, you are already learning from the particles in it.
    "They may have an unpredictable character"
    After all, they decided in advance to interrogate them just because of that, so you don't learn it from them - what's more, "they" don't exist yet.
    "According to the Eisenberg principle: "As scientists try to observe particles, perhaps they are also 'observing' them."
    I don't know who Eisenberg is, but the *Heisenberg* Uncertainty Principle doesn't say anything like that.
    In any case - even according to your claim, you are learning something (wrong) here from the uncertainty principle that was formulated decades ago and not from the particles in the axle (which, as I recall - have not yet been created).
    You also learn from the particles in the axis that:
    "According to the Eisenberg principle: "As scientists try to observe particles, perhaps they are also 'observing' them."
    Tell me how you learn from particles that have not yet been created about questions that people ask.
    You also learn that:
    "If the particles are part of the 'matter' of nature, is it possible that they have a kind of 'survival instinct'."
    Again - you learn from particles that have not yet been created. Is it their survival instinct that prevents them from being created? Don't you know that particles are created and slammed into each other in other accelerators and that an axle is just another accelerator?
    What are you actually trying to say?

    Everything else is just as delusional and I regret spending the time formulating a response to all the hallucinations.

  50. Michael:
    Since when are you the only article reader on the site?
    The world of science is a 'researcher'!!! If you do not have the decency and intellectual honesty to touch the sub-atoms that make up the sub-neurons in your brain that is supposed to think, let others think and ask the questions that are required at all levels of the reality of the atomic particles.
    The accelerator is challenging!!! It raises countless questions and is a subatomic and comprehensive analysis platform for all the essential questions that have ever been asked by humanity.
    If atomic surgery by detonating it alone is of interest to you, please stay in the shadows of the mutations he caused in his time in Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
    We, the people of education in all streams of the population and the leading science in humanity want to learn and understand more
    And more on many levels, in many ways and yet to remain ethical and humane!! And not to lose our image and consciousness.
    And now:
    If you have reservations outright, that's fine, but the right thing to do is if you respond and detail at least according to the sections that were raised and break them down into factors with a constructive and conscious thought.

  51. Yehuda and my father:
    I pointed out the problem to Rami more than a month ago.
    In any case - as long as it is not handled, you can manually change the month in the link (ie - click on the link, get responses from the previous month, then change the link above from the previous month to the current month and press enter).
    This is how you can get the articles that "disappeared" in the meantime

  52. It is very important not to dismiss Hugin's opinion on this issue, out of hand. After all, it has long been known that the result of an experiment at the quantum level may depend on the question being asked and the nature of the experiment itself.
    So please answer here carefully.
    Have a good week everyone
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  53. So what have we learned so far from the 'behaviour of the particles' in the axis?
    a) That they may have an unexpected 'character'.
    b) According to the Eisenberg principle: "As scientists try to observe particles, perhaps they are also 'observing' them.
    c) The question arises whether the particles have 'some kind of consciousness'.
    d) If the particles are part of the 'matter' of nature, is it possible that they have some kind of 'survival instinct'.
    e) If the accelerator system continues its inexplicable antics, the 'bizarre' possibility that these malfunctions may have also been attributed to the 'strange behavior' on the part of the 'nano-researchers' is taken into account, and if so, a new/additional field of science may be defined which may be called: atoms".
    f) If the conditions mentioned above are defined, it will be possible to refer to the theory of mechanics in 'the soul' after the 'material' is defined as having a mechanical 'soul-type'.
    G) At last Roi Tsenza's cute 'Laffy' will get scientific /personal/ and human legitimacy. (Because after all, his laptop already has a name.)
    h) Think about it as you would expect the little ones to think,,,

  54. Sarnland-Disneyland Sarn-Switzerland! Wow, wow:) A great idea for combining school holidays/ summer-autumn for children,, and,,
    A game-scientific trip, a waste of time!
    Roy Tsenza,, think about it :) with you throughout your documented journeys,,:)
    And I would also recommend our brilliant reporter Ran Levy, who was especially recently discovered as having developed vision and senses for diagnosing 'massive phenomena', and also as an excellent expert for solving 'historical-scientific mysteries' in the spirit of the detective, mixed with an informed tone about effects and stunts. :)
    My curiosity is growing moment by moment for further coverage on the matter.

  55. You remember at first they said it was just a small glitch, and in a few days it would go away, but it didn't.
    So it became two months and for each month that passed they added two months.
    Then they said that it would be in the spring that we would sing "Simcha rabha, simcha rabha, spring has arrived, Seren has come" but he didn't come!.
    Now the odds are that at the end of October 2009, something like this will start working, but I think they are working on us
    This facility is too big for them and maybe they should temporarily (or maybe not temporarily) turn it into Serenland - Disneyland in Seren!, and the entire twenty or thirty kilometers will be the largest demon tunnel in the world! That way it can be productive, and also enter the Guinness Book of Records .
    They can even divide it in half and make a half moon and make a mosque as a sign of solidarity with the residents of Gaza. Only they are missing the star in the middle, but you can put an oil barrel instead.
    Between us, I think someone realized that there is no dark mass at all and no Higgs Boson Mix Drix and it's really a waste of money.
    So, good night dark mass!
    with a smile
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.