Comprehensive coverage

light and color

A protein found in a salt-loving microorganism is able to transmit electricity very efficiently. Why did nature bother to give him this feature and then not use it? 


 
The salt evaporation ponds in southern San Francisco Bay. The color of the water is created as a result of the expression of the proteins in the microorganism Lobacterium salinarum
Nature uses evolution to precisely engineer each biological component according to its unique function. Proteins, for example, should not have properties that are not necessary for their activity. But a team of scientists at the Weizmann Institute of Science discovered that a certain protein, found in the outer membrane of living cells, is capable of conducting an electric current, a feature that it is not required to use in its normal function.
The scientists came to the surprising finding in a series of experiments they performed on the bacteriorhodopsin protein they isolated from the outer membrane of Lobacterium salinarum, a salt-loving microorganism that, like plants, in the process of photosynthesis converts sunlight into substances used to produce the energy it needs to sustain life processes. In the retina of the eye there are similar proteins, called rhodopsins, which absorb the light and convert it, but the product of their conversion is not energy, but nerve signals. In both types of proteins - those found in the eye and those found in microorganisms - the origin of these conversions is located in a segment of the protein called retinal derived from vitamin A. The team of scientists, which included Prof. Mordechai (Modi) Shaves, Dean of the Faculty of Chemistry at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Prof. David Kahn, from the Department of Materials and Surfaces, and Dr. Yongdong Jin and Dr. Nega Friedman from the Department of Organic Chemistry, were surprised to discover that the bacteriorhodopsin is able to transmit a current tens of thousands of times stronger than what could be expected to pass through a protein, and that the retinal segment in the protein plays a vital role in the conduction of the electric current.
The scientists found that the transfer of electrons is affected by the absorption of light. This finding is consistent with previous knowledge, that the absorption of light by the protein activates a kind of chemical switch: a chemical double bond found in retinal changes the shape of the molecule, transferring part of the molecule from one side of the bond to the other. The researchers found that after the change occurs in the retinal molecule, the protein's ability to transmit an electric current is doubled. When the scientists replaced the retinal with another molecule that is not able to undergo the chemical change as a result of absorbing light - the electrical conductivity of the protein did not increase.
These findings raise questions regarding the conduct of evolution. Prof. Shaves: "Why did nature bother to create and maintain such an efficient method for transferring electrons, and then not use it? Is this a coincidence, or did nature examine the possibility of using this property of the protein and then, for some reason, refrain from using it (there are known proteins, very different from bacteriorhodopsin, with a highly developed ability to transfer electrons)? And if indeed it was so, why was this possibility ruled out?" These questions preoccupy the scientists, and it is possible that future studies will be able to illuminate some of them. 
Extreme lifestyle Its official name is Lobacterium salinarum. This microorganism, which carries the protein bacteriorhodopsin in its membrane, does not belong to a type of bacteria, but is part of a special "order", called archaea. The members of this group are single-celled organisms, most of them, such as Lobacterium salinarum,
are very ancient from an evolutionary point of view, and live in many places characterized by extreme conditions: sulfur springs in the ground
The ocean, layers of oil in the ground, oxygen-deficient swamps, water springs
Boiling, deep in the Antarctic ice sheet, in acidic environments or
particularly alkaline, and in the digestive systems rich in methane gas of animals.
Halobacterium salinarum, for example, lives and thrives in salt water. The colored proteins found in the outer membrane of Lobacterium salinarum sometimes give the water of the salty lakes where the microorganism lives an oval or pinkish hue.

Lobobacterium salinarum 
 
The bacteriorhodopsin protein, which is found in the microorganism Lobacterium salinarum and is similar in its action to the rhodopsin protein. In the center: the retina

Extreme lifestyle
 Its official name is Lobacterium salinarum. This microorganism, which carries the protein bacteriorhodopsin in its membrane, does not belong to a type of bacteria, but is part of a special "order", called archaea. The members of this group are single-celled creatures, most of them, like Lobacterium salinarum, are very ancient from an evolutionary point of view, and live in many places characterized by extreme conditions: sulfur springs at the bottom of the ocean, oil layers in the earth's condensate, oxygen-deficient swamps, boiling water springs, deep in the Antarctic ice sheet , in acidic environments or
particularly alkaline, and in the digestive systems rich in methane gas of animals.
Halobacterium salinarum, for example, lives and thrives in salt water. The colored proteins found in the outer membrane of Lobacterium salinarum sometimes give the water of the salty lakes where the microorganism lives an oval or pinkish hue.
 

4 תגובות

  1. My friend, please remember - evolution can only tell with one degree of accuracy or another what happened, it will never predict what will happen.
    In this it is similar to something like history ("the rise and fall of..."), and less to a real science like physics that clearly predicts what will happen when an apple is released from its grip on the tree.

  2. For each feature, nature wastes energy to create it. Energy that is subtracted from other properties that benefit the animal.
    Example: Animals such as goats stranded on islands cut off from the mainland, and without predators, change in such a way that their legs for running become shorter. The short-legged ones have an advantage over the long-legged ones, if only because of the smaller effort in eating the grass.
    I am sure that the unicellular body that appears in the article spends a lot of energy while leaving the property of conducting electricity. One only has to look for the advantage that this feature gives him, and no, productions that a mutation prevents this feature from will be superior.
    Suggestions for a solution: for example, predators using an electric shock to damage unicellular organisms, or alternatively, electric currents generated in the salty water.

    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  3. Amir-

    Thanks for the comment.
    If you drafted it - then congratulations and suggest that you start writing on the site.

  4. evolution:
    Nature does not "use" evolution, and evolution does not "precisely engineer every biological component" to exact fit for function.
    The mechanism of evolution means the extinction of creatures or unsuitable traits, not the development of traits for a specific purpose. Evolution is therefore essentially a negative force, even if the result for us is positive.
    According to the theory of evolution, traits may arise by chance. These qualities will disappear if they interfere with the creature's existence, however, there may be a situation in which an apparently unnecessary quality will not be an obstacle to life, and thus will continue to exist even though it does not serve a specific purpose. You can think of the appendix in the human body as an example of this.
    Furthermore, it is the "excess" in the genetic information that enables change and development, since if every creature were adapted with supreme precision to its environment and living conditions, it would immediately become extinct with the slightest change in the environment. On the other hand, it is the surplus of genetic information that constitutes raw material for changes and developments in the future.
    On the Gothic level, nature and evolution are terms that summarize the total occurrence of many phenomena. They are not entities with an independent core, existence in themselves, desires, abilities and so on. Nature does not "take the trouble to create and maintain" a certain feature, does not neglect development and "avoid using it", is not aware of a certain purpose and strives for it. Even if, looking back, it is possible to outline a developmental path, the entire path does not exist in advance. For example, species of marine creatures did not move to live on land as part of a route that ended with the appearance of man. They did it because of a reason in their immediate environment, because they were, by chance perhaps, capable of it, because this ability did not hinder them, but not for a specific purpose.
    Such an understanding of the evolutionary Torah turns the question that appears in the title "Why did nature bother to give him this feature and then not use it?" to incorrect

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.